I'm sorry to see this particular subject turn into an argument, even a well-mannered one.
I do agree that "pictures" go a long way proving a person's statement, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it did or didn't happen.
I of course don't speak as a wood craftsman, but I do know that as an professional technical illustrator, a majority of my work over forty-plus years is restricted by confidentiality-clauses in whatever contracts and understandings that one reaches with clients. And of course, so much is just not kept or copied because in the rush of things, it wasn't deemed all that special at the time. Still, I would not feel particularly happy if my abilities were called into question.
Point is, I can understand if things can't be shown to back up a statement. But, I can also say that I've run into an awful lot of folks who make a claim or statement that can't be substantiated, simply because it isn't true.
But, I don't see that here (maybe I missed it though). It seems that we just have a difference in opinion.
My apologies if I've stuck my unwanted nose in the middle of this, but I have come to respect the postings and the individuals behind them. I just hate to see any of it get fanned into an argument. I'm sure it was all well-meaning and the reader can probably sort out what's what for themselves.

CWS
I do agree that "pictures" go a long way proving a person's statement, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it did or didn't happen.
I of course don't speak as a wood craftsman, but I do know that as an professional technical illustrator, a majority of my work over forty-plus years is restricted by confidentiality-clauses in whatever contracts and understandings that one reaches with clients. And of course, so much is just not kept or copied because in the rush of things, it wasn't deemed all that special at the time. Still, I would not feel particularly happy if my abilities were called into question.
Point is, I can understand if things can't be shown to back up a statement. But, I can also say that I've run into an awful lot of folks who make a claim or statement that can't be substantiated, simply because it isn't true.
But, I don't see that here (maybe I missed it though). It seems that we just have a difference in opinion.
My apologies if I've stuck my unwanted nose in the middle of this, but I have come to respect the postings and the individuals behind them. I just hate to see any of it get fanned into an argument. I'm sure it was all well-meaning and the reader can probably sort out what's what for themselves.

CWS


Comment