A nearby cabinetmaker closed up shop recently, so last Saturday I went up to see if he had anything I could use. The maple lumber he had was gone by the time I got there, and the tools were way out of my league. However, he had some barely used saw blades that were of interest. Two Forrest blades - 30T WWII and Duraline Hi-A/T - looked like they'd barely had the wax coating removed from their carbide tips, but it was the Tenryu Gold Medal 40T that caught my eye. I'd heard some pretty nice things about the Tenryu, and the cabinetmaker absolutely raved about it. So, even though the Forrest blades were probably a better buy, and the Tenryu had obviously been used more, the Japanese blade is the one that went home with me. (Besides, I already own the two Forrest blades.) After a little cleaning and waxing, it could have passed for brand new.
I have no idea why I felt the need to buy another blade; the 30T TK WWII I'm using cuts through hard maple like it's butter. If it ain't broke...
Anyway, I tried two rips with the Tenryu - on oak and maple - with very unsatisfactory results. Feeding took more effort, and then much more effort, causing me to stop halfway through both times to avoid broken belts, hellacious kickback, or both. I finished the cuts by starting from the other ends. That was enough; I put the WWII back on, and picked up where I'd left off.
Now I'm trying to figure out why that happened. At first I assumed that the riving knife on my Shark Guard is to blame. It's the standard size .090" thickness that works well with thin kerf blades, but the Tenryu is neither FK or TK; it measures .111". Would using the .105" thick riving knife solve the problem? (Lee Styron: what do you think?)
How important is centering the riving knife? I just popped the WWII off and the Tenryu on, without changing the position of the knife. Could that have caused, or contributed to, the problem? (BTW, at that time I had all the shims to the left of the riving knife, but I have since moved one to the right. What setup do y'all use with TK blades?)
I suppose the fact that the Tenryu is thicker than the WWII, and has 40 teeth vs. 30, also plays a part. (I have one of the older 13 amp BT3000's, sharing a 20A circuit with the HF DC.) If that turns out to be the most likely reason, however, I guess I'll be getting rid of my other WWII - the 40T FK.
Another possibility, I suppose, is that it needs to be sharpened. I've pretty much discounted that, though, because I don't believe that would cause the saw to bind the way it did. For that to be the case, I should think the wear on the carbide tips would be readily apparent to the naked eye. I didn't even detect any using magnification.
I have no idea why I felt the need to buy another blade; the 30T TK WWII I'm using cuts through hard maple like it's butter. If it ain't broke...

Anyway, I tried two rips with the Tenryu - on oak and maple - with very unsatisfactory results. Feeding took more effort, and then much more effort, causing me to stop halfway through both times to avoid broken belts, hellacious kickback, or both. I finished the cuts by starting from the other ends. That was enough; I put the WWII back on, and picked up where I'd left off.
Now I'm trying to figure out why that happened. At first I assumed that the riving knife on my Shark Guard is to blame. It's the standard size .090" thickness that works well with thin kerf blades, but the Tenryu is neither FK or TK; it measures .111". Would using the .105" thick riving knife solve the problem? (Lee Styron: what do you think?)
How important is centering the riving knife? I just popped the WWII off and the Tenryu on, without changing the position of the knife. Could that have caused, or contributed to, the problem? (BTW, at that time I had all the shims to the left of the riving knife, but I have since moved one to the right. What setup do y'all use with TK blades?)
I suppose the fact that the Tenryu is thicker than the WWII, and has 40 teeth vs. 30, also plays a part. (I have one of the older 13 amp BT3000's, sharing a 20A circuit with the HF DC.) If that turns out to be the most likely reason, however, I guess I'll be getting rid of my other WWII - the 40T FK.
Another possibility, I suppose, is that it needs to be sharpened. I've pretty much discounted that, though, because I don't believe that would cause the saw to bind the way it did. For that to be the case, I should think the wear on the carbide tips would be readily apparent to the naked eye. I didn't even detect any using magnification.

Black wallnut
Loring in Katy, TX USA



Comment