Nobody's mentioned one of the most important things:
No matter how cheap or used the tool, no matter what route you go (cs, used or new TS, water-driven bandsaw, etc.), DO NOT try to save money on the blade.
Get a very good blade.
Normal consumer thought pattern is: "I spent only x on this p.o.s. tool--no point in spending almost x (or more than x) on the blade."
That may sound logical, but it's a fallacy.
The better the blade (or bit), the more it can overcome the shortcomings of the tool. Sandor Nagisxxxxxx(sp.?) has pointed out in several of his books and articles that in many cases, the problem with an inexpensive tool is not the tool itself but the blade or bit that comes with it or its inexpensive replacement.
His philosophy, in fact, for newbies who aren't sure whether they'll stick with ww (in which case they will eventually upgrade the tool) or not (in which case they'll dump the tool) is to get a low-end tool and a high-end blade.
If the newbie takes the upgrade path, they can retain the high-end blade. If the newbie dumps the tool, it and the high-end blade can be sold separately.
Several of us have touched on this idea in some previous threads and become convinced through experience that it's not a crazy idea.
I'd love to see one of the ww magazines run this kind of test--pitting a low-end saw and high-end blade against a high-end saw with a p.o.s. blade.
With your budget, spending $100-150 on a used saw and $100 on a new blade has a good chance of producing very good results.
No matter how cheap or used the tool, no matter what route you go (cs, used or new TS, water-driven bandsaw, etc.), DO NOT try to save money on the blade.
Get a very good blade.
Normal consumer thought pattern is: "I spent only x on this p.o.s. tool--no point in spending almost x (or more than x) on the blade."
That may sound logical, but it's a fallacy.
The better the blade (or bit), the more it can overcome the shortcomings of the tool. Sandor Nagisxxxxxx(sp.?) has pointed out in several of his books and articles that in many cases, the problem with an inexpensive tool is not the tool itself but the blade or bit that comes with it or its inexpensive replacement.
His philosophy, in fact, for newbies who aren't sure whether they'll stick with ww (in which case they will eventually upgrade the tool) or not (in which case they'll dump the tool) is to get a low-end tool and a high-end blade.
If the newbie takes the upgrade path, they can retain the high-end blade. If the newbie dumps the tool, it and the high-end blade can be sold separately.
Several of us have touched on this idea in some previous threads and become convinced through experience that it's not a crazy idea.
I'd love to see one of the ww magazines run this kind of test--pitting a low-end saw and high-end blade against a high-end saw with a p.o.s. blade.
With your budget, spending $100-150 on a used saw and $100 on a new blade has a good chance of producing very good results.
Comment