The end of an era

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BobSch
    Veteran Member
    • Aug 2004
    • 4385
    • Minneapolis, MN, USA.
    • BT3100

    #1

    The end of an era

    NASA is pulling the plug on their last mainframe.

    http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/tec...68?tag=nl.e101
    Bob

    Bad decisions make good stories.
  • pelligrini
    Veteran Member
    • Apr 2007
    • 4217
    • Fort Worth, TX
    • Craftsman 21829

    #2
    They probably had to, because the guys with the slide rules that put it togeather and kept it running have retired.
    Erik

    Comment

    • jackellis
      Veteran Member
      • Nov 2003
      • 2638
      • Tahoe City, CA, USA.
      • BT3100

      #3
      They probably had to, because the guys with the slide rules that put it togeather and kept it running have retired.
      Hey, watch it! I still have a half dozen slide rules and I still use them from time to time.

      Calculators and spreadsheets are for weenies.

      Real men (and women) do the figures in their heads. A lost art.

      Comment

      • cabinetman
        Gone but not Forgotten RIP
        • Jun 2006
        • 15216
        • So. Florida
        • Delta

        #4
        Does anybody remember the IBM 1401?

        .

        Comment

        • Denco
          Established Member
          • Mar 2003
          • 426
          • Coming soon: California
          • BT3100

          #5
          I had a slide rule, but it slid off the table and broke. It's last words were, "This doesn't add up".
          *****Measure twice, cut once.....rats, back to the lumber yard.*****

          Comment

          • LCHIEN
            Super Moderator
            • Dec 2002
            • 21886
            • Katy, TX, USA.
            • BT3000 vintage 1999

            #6
            i7 with six 64-bit cores, with 1.17 billion transistors...

            That chip can do 158.4 GFLOPS - 158 x 10^9 floating point operations per second. Half of that in double precision (according to this doc: http://www.intel.com/standards/floatingpoint.pdf)

            If someone can figure out from the ibm website what any model of the Z9 can do GFlop wise, my hat's off to you.
            Loring in Katy, TX USA
            If your only tool is a hammer, you tend to treat all problems as if they were nails.
            BT3 FAQ - https://www.sawdustzone.org/forum/di...sked-questions

            Comment

            • unknown poster
              Established Member
              • Jan 2006
              • 219
              • .

              #7
              Try searching for IBM mainframe specs in MIPs, not GFLOPS. I guess IBM assumes you won't be using those machines just for floating point operations so they spec them in instructions per sec rather than floating point operations per sec.

              Comment

              • guycox
                Established Member
                • Dec 2003
                • 360
                • Romulak, VA, USA.

                #8
                Originally posted by cabinetman
                Does anybody remember the IBM 1401?

                .
                I was of the 1620 persuasion.
                Guy Cox

                Life isn\'t like a box of chocolates...it\'s more like a jar of jalapenos.
                What you do today, might burn your butt tomorrow.

                Comment

                • jackellis
                  Veteran Member
                  • Nov 2003
                  • 2638
                  • Tahoe City, CA, USA.
                  • BT3100

                  #9
                  My wife was a systems programmer at IBM back in the 1960s. IBM trained her because there were no computer science programs in those days, and she did her coding in assembly language. Her first assignment was writing what we know call device drivers for an early IBM disk drive. Later on she ported the Berkeley Unix Assembler to IBM's first RISC workstation (preceded the Power line). She still has her green plastic card.

                  Today's programmers are spoiled (I know, spoken like a true Luddite). The first computer I ever worked on was a Univac 1108, complete with card reader and something like a half megabyte of magnetic core memory. Later on I got to do some programming on what by then had become an ancient Burroughs machine with 32k of memory. The debugging tools and other aids we take for granted today did not exist. When I first entered the working world as a co-op student and did some programming, debugging code sometimes required reading memory dumps. Since I was working at a remote site, I time-shared using a teletype machine and a 300 baud phone connection. I dont miss those days.

                  Comment

                  • jackellis
                    Veteran Member
                    • Nov 2003
                    • 2638
                    • Tahoe City, CA, USA.
                    • BT3100

                    #10
                    Postscript.

                    I sent my wife the link, who told the story of a colleague at IBM at the time who was from Shanghai and would do an occasional bit of hexadecimal arithmetic out loud in Mandarin.

                    Comment

                    Working...