I can see both sides of the issue.
For those already in some sort of civil stress, having to pay more than usual for goods and services seems like a cruel blow, it would go against the christian sort of nature we profess to have. Hence the public outrage.
On the other hand for the Businessman, either "temporary" or "full time", there are extenuating circumstances.
The businessman who keep his store open longer and later has to pay people to come to work when they would rather be home with their families and protecting or repairing their homes. Or they may already have worked 12 hours that day... Or they have to navigate floods or snow drifts to come to work. He may have to pay them double or triple to work in those circumstances. Maybe rent refrigerator trucks, generators and pay expediting fees to get more supplies in quickly. Should we not reqward those who make these extra efforts?
The man from Oklahoma who bought every portable generator in Enid and rented a truck to bring them to Houston (I just made all that up for an example) right after Hurricane Rita and sold them for three times the list price on the 2nd day of power outages that would last in some cases 2 weeks... Is he gouging? Took time off his regular job, risked money speculating on generators and truck costs with no guarantee the outage was going to last. For people without air conditioning, medical needs, food spoiling, the price is worth it.
So if generators were cheap a week before the storm, should not have the consumer bought it then instead of waiting until after the storm? He gambled and lost, against the entrepaneur from Oklahoma.
Services - like tow trucks in winter storms? Are they entitled to special rates when they have to go out in the worst weather at the most inconvenient time to ply their trade and work exceptionally long hours?
Like I said, I can see both sides.
For those already in some sort of civil stress, having to pay more than usual for goods and services seems like a cruel blow, it would go against the christian sort of nature we profess to have. Hence the public outrage.
On the other hand for the Businessman, either "temporary" or "full time", there are extenuating circumstances.
The businessman who keep his store open longer and later has to pay people to come to work when they would rather be home with their families and protecting or repairing their homes. Or they may already have worked 12 hours that day... Or they have to navigate floods or snow drifts to come to work. He may have to pay them double or triple to work in those circumstances. Maybe rent refrigerator trucks, generators and pay expediting fees to get more supplies in quickly. Should we not reqward those who make these extra efforts?
The man from Oklahoma who bought every portable generator in Enid and rented a truck to bring them to Houston (I just made all that up for an example) right after Hurricane Rita and sold them for three times the list price on the 2nd day of power outages that would last in some cases 2 weeks... Is he gouging? Took time off his regular job, risked money speculating on generators and truck costs with no guarantee the outage was going to last. For people without air conditioning, medical needs, food spoiling, the price is worth it.
So if generators were cheap a week before the storm, should not have the consumer bought it then instead of waiting until after the storm? He gambled and lost, against the entrepaneur from Oklahoma.
Services - like tow trucks in winter storms? Are they entitled to special rates when they have to go out in the worst weather at the most inconvenient time to ply their trade and work exceptionally long hours?
Like I said, I can see both sides.

LCHIEN
Loring in Katy, TX USA
Comment