I haven't been involved with forums as long as some members. What got me interested in participating is the sharing of information and experiences of others. It's a lot like the saying "Ask the man that owns one", which was for a car commercial. In woodworking, there are many facets and avenues, that hold a wealth of information. To have the knowledge and experience and not share it with others will make it a lost art.
When I read a post seeking information, I assimilate all the given information, and if I think I can help or have experience with the materials or procedure, I will formulate my answer as completely as possible, based on the data given in the post. It seems that once replies start the poster starts adding information or changing the data, which might require a different response to the post. I don't know about the members here who actively respond, and there are many, but I do spend time with a reply in order to be as helpful as possible. When the poster comes back with all new or different criteria (that should have been in the first post) it makes a reply futile and a waste of time. Sometimes I wonder if the poster even reads his replies. It's possible that this scenario of adding data or further questions is only an attempt to prolong the post or add replies.
I'm very impressed with the degree of experience and knowledge that is available here. Likewise, a poster should realize when the post is part hooey, or a test to see if there are answers. NOTICE: Experienced members here know when a post is for real or not. In my limited forum experience in a few forums, I can guess who is BS and who isn't. I can guess what questions are BS and which are not. Some posts are contrived with the most inordinate set of circumstances. Of course all questions don't have cut and dry answers, and all circumstances are not ordinary. Could be just to see the type of answers that come in.
And then, to have some informative post that has 50, 100, or 150 views and hardly any replies is beyond me. I'm not really a short answer individual, and I don't think a poster likes to see - "yep" , "great" or a 2-3 word reply. But, I guess any reply is better than none. Hey - this is a rant - remember?
And, my last peeve (not really my last, but for now), are the individuals who consider themselves the "final" and "only" word on a subject and feels there is a reputation at stake and shouldn't be challenged, replies with a bully attitude or requesting some documented proof for an answer. To those I say, having done whatever it is the answer entails is that persons entitlement, or opinion. We all have the right to our own opinion. A persons method may not agree with another. I've read answers that were totally wrong, but in responding will try to offer my opinion, not saying "You're wrong". The way a reply is worded can be confrontational. The "one of the guys" attitude is apparent and may be intimidating to those who would ordinarily participate. Cliques like that don't impress anyone. Forums don't belong to anyone. To dissect someone's answer to create doubt just to boost ego and appear as an "expert", also may be preventing some members from becoming involved. I heard a definition of "expert" as "a fool away from home".
Hidden profiles are the discretion of the member. To feel that there is some insidious reason for doing so can only be reflected by the idea that to see the profile tells necessary information about the poster to aid in an answer. Hogwash. But it's OK for those to secretely check profiles. If that is the real reason, send a private message, or email the individual, so that maybe more detailed information can be shared than what would be in a profile.
Not to lose sight of the value of the discourse in the forum, or the enjoyment of participating and sharing information, we must accept the good with the bad and reap the knowledge and fun offered.
"I'M NEVER WRONG - BUT I'M NOT ALWAYS RIGHT"
When I read a post seeking information, I assimilate all the given information, and if I think I can help or have experience with the materials or procedure, I will formulate my answer as completely as possible, based on the data given in the post. It seems that once replies start the poster starts adding information or changing the data, which might require a different response to the post. I don't know about the members here who actively respond, and there are many, but I do spend time with a reply in order to be as helpful as possible. When the poster comes back with all new or different criteria (that should have been in the first post) it makes a reply futile and a waste of time. Sometimes I wonder if the poster even reads his replies. It's possible that this scenario of adding data or further questions is only an attempt to prolong the post or add replies.
I'm very impressed with the degree of experience and knowledge that is available here. Likewise, a poster should realize when the post is part hooey, or a test to see if there are answers. NOTICE: Experienced members here know when a post is for real or not. In my limited forum experience in a few forums, I can guess who is BS and who isn't. I can guess what questions are BS and which are not. Some posts are contrived with the most inordinate set of circumstances. Of course all questions don't have cut and dry answers, and all circumstances are not ordinary. Could be just to see the type of answers that come in.
And then, to have some informative post that has 50, 100, or 150 views and hardly any replies is beyond me. I'm not really a short answer individual, and I don't think a poster likes to see - "yep" , "great" or a 2-3 word reply. But, I guess any reply is better than none. Hey - this is a rant - remember?
And, my last peeve (not really my last, but for now), are the individuals who consider themselves the "final" and "only" word on a subject and feels there is a reputation at stake and shouldn't be challenged, replies with a bully attitude or requesting some documented proof for an answer. To those I say, having done whatever it is the answer entails is that persons entitlement, or opinion. We all have the right to our own opinion. A persons method may not agree with another. I've read answers that were totally wrong, but in responding will try to offer my opinion, not saying "You're wrong". The way a reply is worded can be confrontational. The "one of the guys" attitude is apparent and may be intimidating to those who would ordinarily participate. Cliques like that don't impress anyone. Forums don't belong to anyone. To dissect someone's answer to create doubt just to boost ego and appear as an "expert", also may be preventing some members from becoming involved. I heard a definition of "expert" as "a fool away from home".
Hidden profiles are the discretion of the member. To feel that there is some insidious reason for doing so can only be reflected by the idea that to see the profile tells necessary information about the poster to aid in an answer. Hogwash. But it's OK for those to secretely check profiles. If that is the real reason, send a private message, or email the individual, so that maybe more detailed information can be shared than what would be in a profile.
Not to lose sight of the value of the discourse in the forum, or the enjoyment of participating and sharing information, we must accept the good with the bad and reap the knowledge and fun offered.
"I'M NEVER WRONG - BUT I'M NOT ALWAYS RIGHT"
Comment