I find all kinds of info on using either the jig or the dado. I'm wondering why not both?
I use a Grizzly tenoning jig to cut my tenons. I usually precut the shoulders and cheeks on the table saw then run them through the jig like everyone says to do. It works well but requires 8 passes for each tenon. I’m working on a piece that will require 48 tenons. That’s a lot of passes and a lot of room for mistakes. I’m wondering why it can’t be done with the jig and my dado. Using a face board to catch the excess blade of the dado, I can take off ¼ inch on each pass leaving an accurate shoulder/cheek on each pass.
I wrote Grizzly to ask why this shouldn’t be done, they replied that "
the risk of kick back was too great” and it shouldn’t be done. If I’ve got my head correct on this, the orientation of blade to the wood (and grain) clamped into the jig is just a “vertical rip cut” and no different than a dado ripped horizontally into four faces of say, a 8/4 piece of stock? I would think the clamping action of the jig would provide even greater safety?
I use a Grizzly tenoning jig to cut my tenons. I usually precut the shoulders and cheeks on the table saw then run them through the jig like everyone says to do. It works well but requires 8 passes for each tenon. I’m working on a piece that will require 48 tenons. That’s a lot of passes and a lot of room for mistakes. I’m wondering why it can’t be done with the jig and my dado. Using a face board to catch the excess blade of the dado, I can take off ¼ inch on each pass leaving an accurate shoulder/cheek on each pass.
I wrote Grizzly to ask why this shouldn’t be done, they replied that "
the risk of kick back was too great” and it shouldn’t be done. If I’ve got my head correct on this, the orientation of blade to the wood (and grain) clamped into the jig is just a “vertical rip cut” and no different than a dado ripped horizontally into four faces of say, a 8/4 piece of stock? I would think the clamping action of the jig would provide even greater safety?

Comment