I know this is gonna sound crazy. I love my WWII blade.
But when I was working on my LVL workbench and ripping those LVL beams, I decided I should be using a ripping blade to ease the load on the motor. I went to Home Depot and purchased for about $25 a Freud Diablo D1024X.
The Freud did have an easier time cutting those LVL's. I figured I'd switch to the WWII when I was done w/ the bench project, but not having time I've been using the Freud for all sorts of stuff.
And the cuts, even in plywood, are exceptional. I honestly can't see a difference between the Freud and the Forrest. It is early, need to cut more wood, but I don't see a difference.
Am I crazy leaving the Freud on the saw? It would seem that the fewest teeth that gives the desired cut quality is that best blade to use. Or am I missing something. Am I likely to find a problem I haven't considered?
Thanks,
Phil
But when I was working on my LVL workbench and ripping those LVL beams, I decided I should be using a ripping blade to ease the load on the motor. I went to Home Depot and purchased for about $25 a Freud Diablo D1024X.
The Freud did have an easier time cutting those LVL's. I figured I'd switch to the WWII when I was done w/ the bench project, but not having time I've been using the Freud for all sorts of stuff.
And the cuts, even in plywood, are exceptional. I honestly can't see a difference between the Freud and the Forrest. It is early, need to cut more wood, but I don't see a difference.
Am I crazy leaving the Freud on the saw? It would seem that the fewest teeth that gives the desired cut quality is that best blade to use. Or am I missing something. Am I likely to find a problem I haven't considered?
Thanks,
Phil



Comment