Eight hours prep, 20 minutes to cut

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JR
    The Full Monte
    • Feb 2004
    • 5636
    • Eugene, OR
    • BT3000

    #1

    Eight hours prep, 20 minutes to cut

    A couple of days ago I posted this pic of the table I'm working on.



    The next cut on the project is a tricky one. I'm going to put a shelf in at the lower level. The top of the shelf must meet the lower stretchers right at their tops. It must also be inset into the legs to meet the sides of the stretchers (there's about a 5/8" reveal between stretcher and leg). In effect the stretchers act as facing for the plywood shelf.

    I decided to cut the dadoes in one cut for all eight legs.

    The cut I needed is 5/8" deep by 23/32" wide. The top of the shelf needs to be 8" from the lower end of the posts. I want a tight fit for the plywood and consistent distance from the floor.

    Here's the jig I came up with.



    I used piece of the plywood to set the gap and a top-bearing straight bit to make the cut. Actually, I had to use two bits. I have two 1/2" straight bits, one with 1/2" in cutter height and the other with 1" cutter height. Neither one could do the whole job.

    Here's the result.



    The jig prevented tearout very well for the most part. Where the bit leave the groove on the chamfers you'll see some tearout. There's only 1/16" reveal on either side of the stetchers there, so I risked the cut. Successfully. Besides, the time had come to make the cut when I realized this risk and I just bull-headedly went forward.

    Thanks for looking.

    Oh, I forgot to say, all comments gleefully accepted. If you have different way you would have approached this, or even reproach for the way I did it, bring 'em on. This is a discussion forum, after all!

    JR
    JR
  • LarryG
    The Full Monte
    • May 2004
    • 6693
    • Off The Back
    • Powermatic PM2000, BT3100-1

    #2
    Looks like a good approach to me. Sometimes it seems like half of woodworking is figuring out the best sequence, or which is the least of the various evils.

    One question, though: if you had plunged the bit into the void space at the chamfers, and worked in both directions, always moving the router away from the chamfers ... wouldn't that have mitigated the tearout risk?
    Larry

    Comment

    • JR
      The Full Monte
      • Feb 2004
      • 5636
      • Eugene, OR
      • BT3000

      #3
      Originally posted by LarryG
      ... wouldn't that have mitigated the tearout risk?
      Yes, perhaps. But when I got in there I just wasn't real comfortable maneuvering the router around like that. The visibility was not good there. And even with all the constraints offered by the jig, I was concerned that I'd tilt the router or do something else goofy.

      I guess it just felt better to let the bearing find a side of the jig, then run it around as if there were no chamfers to worry about.

      JR
      JR

      Comment

      Working...