I had the 21825 which is about the same saw as the 24883 without the extensions. Long story short, you don't want it over a BT.
It worked OK for what it was and I had gotten used to it's quirks so that I could turn out some decent work, but when I moved up to a BT3100 I found the Ryobi to be a superior saw. Aside from the other advantages, IMHO the SMT alone is worth the price difference of the two saws. I also have a CMS, but prefer the SMT. Any more I only use the CMS for long stock.
It worked OK for what it was and I had gotten used to it's quirks so that I could turn out some decent work, but when I moved up to a BT3100 I found the Ryobi to be a superior saw. Aside from the other advantages, IMHO the SMT alone is worth the price difference of the two saws. I also have a CMS, but prefer the SMT. Any more I only use the CMS for long stock.


), but it does have two solid cast iron wings, a quiet induction motor, a decent fence, and straight forward simple rugged design. It might not be for you, but at least you'll know after checking it out.
Comment