If there's a good thing about all this, it's that it took place within 30 days of purchasing both saw and blade.
For all of Amazon's quirks, replacing a defective product within 30 days is really simple...one form produced a new blade sent by overnight shipping and a label to print out for returning the bad one, at their expense. Couldn't possibly be easier unless they 'flew a man out', as Rolls Royce supposedly once did, with the new blade.
Now to figure out what to say to Sears. My tentative working theory, taking into account everybody's answers, is that when the bad tooth met the hard little chunk of oak, it was just like crunching on a piece of pecan shell with a bad human tooth--pieces of both fly all over the place. Good tooth, shell, no problem; bad tooth, no shell, no problem; when the two encounter each other, problem.
The end of the oak probably split into two pieces, one flying forward to wedge apart the gap in the throat plate so it could fit through.
Unfortunately, I can't see that being a Sears warranty issue.
For all of Amazon's quirks, replacing a defective product within 30 days is really simple...one form produced a new blade sent by overnight shipping and a label to print out for returning the bad one, at their expense. Couldn't possibly be easier unless they 'flew a man out', as Rolls Royce supposedly once did, with the new blade.
Now to figure out what to say to Sears. My tentative working theory, taking into account everybody's answers, is that when the bad tooth met the hard little chunk of oak, it was just like crunching on a piece of pecan shell with a bad human tooth--pieces of both fly all over the place. Good tooth, shell, no problem; bad tooth, no shell, no problem; when the two encounter each other, problem.
The end of the oak probably split into two pieces, one flying forward to wedge apart the gap in the throat plate so it could fit through.
Unfortunately, I can't see that being a Sears warranty issue.
Comment