I started reading the book Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics, which is based on a doctoral thesis. I was a little alarmed by a couple of the statistics and I wonder if any of you all might have some comments on it.
Twenty-three U.S. elementary school teachers were asked to create a "story" to conceptually illustrate the question, "What is 1 3/4 divided by 1/2?" Only one gave a correct story, and the problem was approached in only one way. When it came to calculating the answer on paper, 40% got it right.
To contrast, 90% of Chinese teachers were able to come up with a correct conceptual story, with about 17% providing more than one strategy (e.g. measurement versus product/factors). All of them came up with the corerct answer on paper.
My wife and I were talking about it, and I wonder what the deal is. I suppose that if elementary teachers don't usually teach division by fractions, then they might have assumed the author meant to multiply (which is what nearly all of them did). But, could it be that we're just really missing the boat (assuming this admittedly small sample reflects the population)?
Twenty-three U.S. elementary school teachers were asked to create a "story" to conceptually illustrate the question, "What is 1 3/4 divided by 1/2?" Only one gave a correct story, and the problem was approached in only one way. When it came to calculating the answer on paper, 40% got it right.
To contrast, 90% of Chinese teachers were able to come up with a correct conceptual story, with about 17% providing more than one strategy (e.g. measurement versus product/factors). All of them came up with the corerct answer on paper.
My wife and I were talking about it, and I wonder what the deal is. I suppose that if elementary teachers don't usually teach division by fractions, then they might have assumed the author meant to multiply (which is what nearly all of them did). But, could it be that we're just really missing the boat (assuming this admittedly small sample reflects the population)?
Comment