My only track time in my car was at an autocross organized by the local chapter of the BMW Car Club of America (BMWCCA) at the BMW performance center. It was higher speed than the few other autocrosses I had done. Fast drivers were getting over 70 mph, I got a little over 60. They put cones on the track to slow us down or we would have gone faster. In some of the driving courses on this track, one of the instructors told me they go over 100 mph. Because I own a convertible, I cannot drive in driving schools organized by the BMWCCA without an approved roll bar. I drove the same track at lower speeds in a BMW owned by the performance center when my son and I took delivery at the Performance Center (it was a blast).
My son's truck is older than he is and has "three on the tree". Who knows what that is? Who has driven a truck or car with this sort of transmission? It is far too old to have any sort of stability package so if you go too fast into the corner and lift off the gas, you are going to be spinning (or worse). One of the things that bugs me about labeling a SUV unsafe because of a little tail wagging is somebody might own a model a few years old with no stability protection. The Lexus may not be most of our definition of ideal with respect to stability protection but it would be a lot safer most of the time than a vehicle with none. That point could be missed by the somewhat overblown (IMHO) warning put out by Consumer Reports. It could also have other desirable features that make it a good choice versus a SUV with "better" stability protection.
Jim
My son's truck is older than he is and has "three on the tree". Who knows what that is? Who has driven a truck or car with this sort of transmission? It is far too old to have any sort of stability package so if you go too fast into the corner and lift off the gas, you are going to be spinning (or worse). One of the things that bugs me about labeling a SUV unsafe because of a little tail wagging is somebody might own a model a few years old with no stability protection. The Lexus may not be most of our definition of ideal with respect to stability protection but it would be a lot safer most of the time than a vehicle with none. That point could be missed by the somewhat overblown (IMHO) warning put out by Consumer Reports. It could also have other desirable features that make it a good choice versus a SUV with "better" stability protection.
Jim
Comment