I think I goofed

[BobSch]

Got this in an email

[crokett]

That is a very clever photoshop job. I am calling it that rather than it being taper cut that way because the grain pattern doesn't look right.

[cabinetman]

Do you bite your nails?
.

[germdoc]

You must be working on an Escher piece...

[BobSch]

That is a very clever photoshop job. I am calling it that rather than it being taper cut that way because the grain pattern doesn't look right.

No p-shop at all, the one board is on top of the other. It's also shorter.

[Black wallnut]

No p-shop at all, the one board is on top of the other. It's also shorter.

I came to this very same conclusion after careful study of the enlarged pic.

[Cubsfan]

Someone help me out. All I've ever seen is one shorter board on top of another. What are all you guys seeing?

[crokett]

No p-shop at all, the one board is on top of the other. It's also shorter.

Ok, I was complicating things then. I was seeing something that now drawing it on paper I don't think it can exist.

[Norm in Fujino]

You must be working on an Escher piece...

Took the words out of my mouth!

[phi1l]

No p-shop at all, the one board is on top of the other. It's also shorter.

It is an Escher thing. in the forground the 2 pieces of wood are one on top of the other & the back ground they are next to each other. the foreground right of the top pieces becomes the top of the other pieces in the back ground. The only way that could happen is if there is only one piece of wood, but the end grain indicates that 2 pieces were used to compose the picture.