UFO Over Moscow

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • crokett
    The Full Monte
    • Jan 2003
    • 10627
    • Mebane, NC, USA.
    • Ryobi BT3000

    #1

    UFO Over Moscow

    The link has video.

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...er-Moscow.html
    David

    The chief cause of failure in this life is giving up what you want most for what you want at the moment.
  • cabinetman
    Gone but not Forgotten RIP
    • Jun 2006
    • 15216
    • So. Florida
    • Delta

    #2
    Video looks fake to me. One of those doctored up jobs.
    .

    Comment

    • reddog552
      Established Member
      • Dec 2006
      • 245
      • Belleville Il.
      • Bt3000

      #3
      fake video

      YEP looks like them light poles are off a train set
      The bitterness of poor quality lingers long after the sweetness of low cost is forgotten!

      Comment

      • crokett
        The Full Monte
        • Jan 2003
        • 10627
        • Mebane, NC, USA.
        • Ryobi BT3000

        #4
        Originally posted by cabinetman
        Video looks fake to me. One of those doctored up jobs.
        .
        Could be. I just thought the story was unusual. Don't care much either way.
        David

        The chief cause of failure in this life is giving up what you want most for what you want at the moment.

        Comment

        • herb fellows
          Veteran Member
          • Apr 2007
          • 1867
          • New York City
          • bt3100

          #5
          The 'newspaper' involved, The Sun, makes the National Enquirer look like the Washington Post. I do believe they had pictures of Bush making a deal with aliens.
          You don't need a parachute to skydive, you only need a parachute to skydive twice.

          Comment

          • woodturner
            Veteran Member
            • Jun 2008
            • 2049
            • Western Pennsylvania
            • General, Sears 21829, BT3100

            #6
            Originally posted by crokett
            I watched the video. I don't see any of the usual signs of photographic alteration - shadows that are inconsistent, the moving object passing in front of some foreground objects, etc.

            However, if you watch the ground, light poles, etc. it appears that the video was taken from a moving vehicle. What happens when you take video of a stationary object from a moving vehicle? Without conflicting visual cues, it creates the impression that the object is moving.

            It appears to me to be a low cloud, maybe a smoke cloud. It appears to me the object is stationary and that photographing it from a moving vehicle creates the impression of movement.
            --------------------------------------------------
            Electrical Engineer by day, Woodworker by night

            Comment

            Working...