Would this pass inspection?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cgallery
    Veteran Member
    • Sep 2004
    • 4503
    • Milwaukee, WI
    • BT3K

    #1

    Would this pass inspection?

    So I'm watching a build out in a retail store where they are trying to do it on the cheap. They are assembling a couple of partition walls that are not load bearing. Their studs, which they are reusing, are too short. So they are butting two together and adding a brace about 3' long at the joint.

    I don't really care, just wonder if it is something that an inspector would sign off on?
  • pelligrini
    Veteran Member
    • Apr 2007
    • 4217
    • Fort Worth, TX
    • Craftsman 21829

    #2
    For non load bearing I don't recall anything saying that it has to be continuous. I don't get into the structural parts of the codes very much though.
    Erik

    Comment

    • Daryl
      Senior Member
      • May 2004
      • 831
      • .

      #3
      Do they actually have a building permit? Maybe it won't matter what an inspector says if it isn't inspected.
      Sometimes the old man passed out and left the am radio on so I got to hear the oldie songs and current event kind of things

      Comment

      • cgallery
        Veteran Member
        • Sep 2004
        • 4503
        • Milwaukee, WI
        • BT3K

        #4
        Originally posted by Daryl
        Do they actually have a building permit? Maybe it won't matter what an inspector says if it isn't inspected.
        Well, I think they actually pulled a permit, and I think they are hoping to get the drywall up before the framing is inspected.

        But they don't know if it is a problem, and neither do I. I just don't know if butting studs is acceptable when the wall isn't load bearing. I imagine it would be totally unacceptable on a load bearing wall, but I don't even know that for sure (although I would never accept it for a load bearing wall myself).

        Comment

        • Alex Franke
          Veteran Member
          • Feb 2007
          • 2641
          • Chapel Hill, NC
          • Ryobi BT3100

          #5
          Originally posted by cgallery
          I don't really care, just wonder if it is something that an inspector would sign off on?
          I vote yes. (But the only expertise I can even begin to claim in this matter is what I pick up at H4H, so it's only a guess.)
          online at http://www.theFrankes.com
          while ( !( succeed = try() ) ) ;
          "Life is short, Art long, Occasion sudden and dangerous, Experience deceitful, and Judgment difficult." -Hippocrates

          Comment

          • Uncle Cracker
            The Full Monte
            • May 2007
            • 7091
            • Sunshine State
            • BT3000

            #6
            I have seen framing inspections done while only the roofing and bearing walls were framed. The interior non-bearing partitions were not even built yet. I don't know if that is a widespread practice or not. I suppose if you can make a partition out of a clothesline and a bed sheet, then it probably won't matter if the studs are spliced or not...

            Comment

            • LarryG
              The Full Monte
              • May 2004
              • 6693
              • Off The Back
              • Powermatic PM2000, BT3100-1

              #7
              I don't see a problem for a non-bearing partition. It might be subject to the whims of a given inspector, though.

              A splice could also be acceptable for even a load-bearing wall -- the kicker is that you'd probably have to furnish calculations from a structural engineer showing it would work.
              Larry

              Comment

              Working...