The REAL Story of Thanksgiving

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • germdoc
    Veteran Member
    • Nov 2003
    • 3567
    • Omaha, NE
    • BT3000--the gray ghost

    #16
    At the risk of flogging a dead horse (or turkey?) let me point out that my "truth" comment was a joke, and I absolutely don't agree with the article that was referenced at the beginning of this thread.

    But, as a history major and amateur historian I always try to be open to new ideas and to challenge received wisdom.

    I grew up in the south in the 60's. Things were very simple then: cowboys good, Indians bad (except for that little episode where they put down their war axes and fed the Pilgrims). Americans good, Japanese and Germans bad. Robert E. Lee good, U.S. Grant and Abraham Lincoln VERY VERY bad. Lester Maddox and George Wallace good, Martin Luther King bad. And so on.

    As times change, so does our perception of history. (I refrain from using the word "truth" here.) Is this "revisionism" or "correction"? For some people revisionism conjures up an image of PC gone amok, but if there's a better word for re-imagining the past based on new information, I'm all for it.
    Jeff


    “Doctors are men who prescribe medicines of which they know little, to cure diseases of which they know less, in human beings of whom they know nothing”--Voltaire

    Comment

    • leehljp
      The Full Monte
      • Dec 2002
      • 8732
      • Tunica, MS
      • BT3000/3100

      #17
      Originally posted by germdoc
      At the risk of flogging a dead horse (or turkey?) let me point out that my "truth" comment was a joke, and I absolutely don't agree with the article that was referenced at the beginning of this thread.

      But, as a history major and amateur historian I always try to be open to new ideas and to challenge received wisdom.

      As times change, so does our perception of history. (I refrain from using the word "truth" here.) Is this "revisionism" or "correction"? For some people revisionism conjures up an image of PC gone amok, but if there's a better word for re-imagining the past based on new information, I'm all for it.
      Perception of history does get changed - and not always to the actual facts. It takes archeology to do that - long after the perceptions lose their weight. I agree with you. I often wonder what REALLY went on way back when. Accounts of fishermen on the eastern coast of what is now the US way before the pilgrims or even Columbus point more to the Irish. I would really like to know what the real history of the Irish ancestors travel was before the English recordings came into effect. (Trying to be polite here.)

      All of this is from one with heritage from Normandy, England, Ireland, and Chickasaw!
      Hank Lee

      Experience is what you get when you don't get what you wanted!

      Comment

      • Uncle Cracker
        The Full Monte
        • May 2007
        • 7091
        • Sunshine State
        • BT3000

        #18
        The stark fact is that we are living tomorrow's history now... Even with all the technology now available to document times and events, I still wonder how our era will end up depicted in the future... More accurately than those gone by? Less? With cynicism, or a feeling of accomplishment? Food for thought...

        Comment

        Working...