A preliminary air quality analysis of my shop

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jking
    replied
    Originally posted by cgallery
    On returning to the shop, it was reading 53/4. You have to add "00" to the end of the readings, so 53/4 translates to 5300 particles total (per cubic foot), with 400 of them being larger than about 5 microns. So far, so good (looking at the table my reading was considered good).
    Clarify something for me. You get the reading of 53/4 & compare this to the table to determine "cleanliness ranking". Then you would add the "00" to the end to get the number of particles per cubic foot. Did I understand correctly?

    I'm also curious where you bought the particle counter.

    Leave a comment:


  • gugie
    replied
    Wow, didn't know there were any airborne particle counters designed for home use. Found this: http://allergyclean.com/dylos.htm, which seems to be the unit you're using.

    I'm in the semiconductor industry, do a lot of work particle reduction, and am one of the few people I know who have actually ready either the FED STD 209 (obsolete) or ISO 14644 documents. I haven't seen any cheap airborne particle counters, this looks very interesting. Since most of these things are sold to determine cleanroom cleanliness, sensitivity and accuracy are important. For home use, I can imagine making one on the cheap, with results "good enough".

    Leave a comment:


  • cgallery
    started a topic A preliminary air quality analysis of my shop

    A preliminary air quality analysis of my shop

    So I don't know if this belongs in Tool Talk or not but it sorta has to do with dust collection and I figured I'd put it here.

    Background: My shop is in my basement. I have a Ryobi BT3K, a small Inca (8-5/8" wide but short bed) jointer/planer, Inca 9-1/2" bandsaw, A Ridgid oscillating belt sander, and a router table with downdraft box. I use a Ridgid shop vac with 2-1/2" flex hose network for "dust" collection (along with a separator).

    All my tools have 2-1/2" or smaller ports. I have a couple of different dust collectors but I don't use them because I just can't run 4" piping (perhaps some day I will figure out a way to do this--my shop is TINY). My shop vac gets about 150-160 CFM w/o separator. With the separator and network I get about 125-CFM. Absolutely not enough for collection of fine dust.

    So the more I read Bill Pentz's site (among others) the more concerned I've gotten that I'm breathing boxcar loads of super-fine dust. That, this dust never settles and every time I enter the shop I breath more of it.

    I realize my setup is sub-optimum, but the question is, how much of a price am I paying for it?

    Recently I stumbled upon a particle counter that is really geared towards homeowners. It uses a laser to count particles in two sizes.

    From the manual:
    "Small particles are all particles detected by the DC1100 right down to its detection limit--typically below 1-micron. Large particles are all particles detected above the large particle threshold which is typically around 5 microns."
    The meter comes with a table to help interpret the readings:
    0 - 25 Excellent Air Quality
    25 - 50 Very Good
    50 - 100 Good
    100 - 350 Fair
    350 - 1000 Poor
    1000 + Very Poor
    So I got this thing and plugged it in in my basement and let it settle for a half hour or so. I had not used any tools for at least 24-hours.

    On returning to the shop, it was reading 53/4. You have to add "00" to the end of the readings, so 53/4 translates to 5300 particles total (per cubic foot), with 400 of them being larger than about 5 microns. So far, so good (looking at the table my reading was considered good).

    So I switched on the vac and started to cut some MDF. I basically cut the edge off a 3/4" thick piece of 24" long MDF, taking about six swipes. This type of cut (where the blade isn't buried in the wood but rather the left edge of the blade is exposed) seems to generate the largest amount of visible dust above the saw.

    I then switched off the saw and watched the meter spike. Approx. one minute after I was done cutting, the meter hit a max of 1955/515. So 195,500 particles (down to 1-micron) and 51,500 larger than 5.0 microns. Nearly twice the 1000+ reading that garners a "poor" rating from their table.

    Subsequent readings:

    +3 minutes (from peak): 1001/223
    +9 minutes (from peak): 499/91
    +46 minutes (from peak): 54/2 (now, it could have been low for a while, I had to go upstairs and wasn't paying super-close attention to the meter).

    I'm taking for granted that the meter does, in fact, measure down to under 1-micron. However, I will say that the meter is extremely sensitive. Just moving around in the area (within six feet of the meter) causes readings to climb.

    Some interesting factors: Above the saw is a vent from the furnace. The furnace has a Honeywell electronic air cleaner. When I close this vent, and let the [new] fine dust air cleaner (down to .3-micron) filter run for just fifteen or so minutes, the meter gets down to 18/1. With the vent reopened the meter almost immediately climbs to 50ish/3-4ish. So my take on this is that, with the vent open, the air from the rest of the house dilutes the super dirty air the table saw creates as I cut. So after cutting the #'s peak, but then fairly quickly start to drop again.

    It is too early to make any real generalizations. I hope to use the meter to improve dust collection/filtering in my shop, home, and office (where we service PC's that are full of dust--similar issues to home wood shop).

    BTW, the black thing is the meter, the big thing sitting on the floor is my new fine air filter.
    Last edited by cgallery; 01-10-2008, 08:29 PM.
Working...