The developer was silultaneously using his models along with a $4500 six-channel particle counter. His background is in designing cleanroom monitoring equipment (that runs into the tens of thousands of dollars).
Electrostatically? Wouldn't that pull the particle in from the field towards the edge and make it impossible to count?
I admit that I have absolutely no idea how the technology works.
The amount of airborne dusts varies greatly in a shop environment. There really is no such thing as eliminating variability. Walk around a little and your numbers can spike by 5x. Sweep the floor and within seconds you'll increase your counts by a factor of at least 10x (often quite a bit more).
I have the 1/5 model and will purchase the .5/2.5 as well. I am quite confident that the #'s reported are quite accurate as far as particle counter tolerances allow. He talked a little about the differences and variability in even the multi-thousand dollar units. It seems like he really has a handle on the technology and is delivering a product that will work very well in the shop.
Electrostatically? Wouldn't that pull the particle in from the field towards the edge and make it impossible to count?
I admit that I have absolutely no idea how the technology works.
The amount of airborne dusts varies greatly in a shop environment. There really is no such thing as eliminating variability. Walk around a little and your numbers can spike by 5x. Sweep the floor and within seconds you'll increase your counts by a factor of at least 10x (often quite a bit more).
I have the 1/5 model and will purchase the .5/2.5 as well. I am quite confident that the #'s reported are quite accurate as far as particle counter tolerances allow. He talked a little about the differences and variability in even the multi-thousand dollar units. It seems like he really has a handle on the technology and is delivering a product that will work very well in the shop.
Comment